Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorKeseljevic, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-12T05:43:47Z
dc.date.available2016-01-12T05:43:47Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2008, č. 3, s. 73-84.cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-5604 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ekonomie-management.cz/download/1331826681_f899/06_keseljevic.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/17242
dc.format12 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Managementcs
dc.rights© Technická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0cs
dc.subjectznalostcs
dc.subjectznalostní managementcs
dc.subjectsociální kapitálcs
dc.subjectintelektuální kapitálcs
dc.subjectvědecká mezioborovostcs
dc.titleGoing beyond the derogative attitude toward knowledge within particular scientific communitiesen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedBy establishing his own theoretical model, the author is seeking to approach to knowledge in an entirely new way. From the aspect of substance the author understands knowledge, as the key source of competitive advantage in the markets at the brake of the millennium, as information, cognitive process, and capital. Knowledge is understood in the article as a set of experiences where information is classified into patterns of thought cognitive processes. Cognitive processes are important for understanding of all processes related to knowledge, as knowledge cannot exist without its subject, to which the capacity of cognition is ascribed. Characterizing knowledge as capital brings economic effects to its owners, as it is ascribed certain economic market value to knowledge. Author believes that cohabitation of human, social, and intellectual capital enables un- derstanding knowledge as capital in its full meaning. From a holistic-cognitive aspect the author ar- gues that inadequate understanding of knowledge is a consequence of an over-institutionalization of science within particular scientific communities. The author wishes to stress that adequate and correct understanding of knowledge requires a high level of scientific interdisciplinarity. Deeper understanding of knowledge requires that we overcome the traditional divisions in the scientific community, since this is the only way of going beyond the derogative attitude towards knowledge within particular scientific communities. For economic theory to fully understand knowledge within its own scientific community, it will have to devote less attention to its own expansion, and more to cooperation with other scientific disciplines.en
dc.subject.translatedknowledgeen
dc.subject.translatedknowledge managementen
dc.subject.translatedsocial capitalen
dc.subject.translatedintellectual capitalen
dc.subject.translatedscientific interdisciplinarityen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 3 (2008)
Číslo 3 (2008)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
06_keseljevic.pdfPlný text73,02 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít
Zobrazit minimální záznam Zobrazit statistiky


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/17242

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.

hledání
navigace
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikace ZČU / UWB Publications
  3. Časopisy ZČU / UWB Journals
  4. Ekonomie a management
  5. 2008
  6. Číslo 3 (2008)